This incident has been reported in the following books.
1. Tabari
2. Musnaf Ibn Abi Shayba
3. Al-Imamiya wa Siyasiah attributted to Ibn Qutaiba (it is a pseudo work which is falsely attrubutted to Ibn Qutaiba and is not accepted by the ahle sunnah scholars, we will not discuss it here)
We will refute them one by one inshaAllah
Tabari
First of all, it is reported in Tabari.
Its chain of narration is
ابن حمید ۔۔۔ جریر ۔۔۔ مغیرہ ۔۔۔ زیاد بن کلیب
Ibn Humayd - Jarir - Mughaira - Ziyad bin Kulayb
The narrator , Ibn Humayd has been criticized by lots of scholars
Razi said
He mixes asnaad (chain of narrations) and matan (text) of narrations (دخلت على محمد بن حميد وهو يركب الأسانيد على المتون)
Nasai said
He is not trustworthy (ليس بثقة)
Asadi said
He is a great liar ( احذق بالكذب )
Al Iraqi said
He is one of the liars (هو أحد الكذابين)
Jozjani said
He is not trustworthy (غير ثقة)
1. Tabari
2. Musnaf Ibn Abi Shayba
3. Al-Imamiya wa Siyasiah attributted to Ibn Qutaiba (it is a pseudo work which is falsely attrubutted to Ibn Qutaiba and is not accepted by the ahle sunnah scholars, we will not discuss it here)
We will refute them one by one inshaAllah
Tabari
First of all, it is reported in Tabari.
Its chain of narration is
ابن حمید ۔۔۔ جریر ۔۔۔ مغیرہ ۔۔۔ زیاد بن کلیب
Ibn Humayd - Jarir - Mughaira - Ziyad bin Kulayb
The narrator , Ibn Humayd has been criticized by lots of scholars
Razi said
He mixes asnaad (chain of narrations) and matan (text) of narrations (دخلت على محمد بن حميد وهو يركب الأسانيد على المتون)
Nasai said
He is not trustworthy (ليس بثقة)
Asadi said
He is a great liar ( احذق بالكذب )
Al Iraqi said
He is one of the liars (هو أحد الكذابين)
Jozjani said
He is not trustworthy (غير ثقة)